Society have subverted some of our individual rights

Which is to say, this language has been used in a whole assortment of ways. Thus if the notion of the rights of man has become the hallmark of modern ethical theory and liberal politics, it is nevertheless a confused notion. There were, there are, different languages of the rights of man, and these languages must first of all be distinguished one from the another.

Society have subverted some of our individual rights

Most agricultural civilizations downgraded the status and potential of women, at least according to modern Western standards and to the implicit standards of hunting-and-gathering societies. Agricultural civilizations were characteristically patriarchal; that is, they were run by men and based on the assumption that men directed political, economic, and cultural life.

Furthermore, as agricultural civilizations developed over time and became more prosperous and more elaborately organized, the status of women deteriorated from its initial level. Individual families were normally set up on a patriarchal basis, with the husband and father determining fundamental conditions and making the key decisions, and with humble obedience owed to this male authority.

Characteristic patriarchal conditions developed in Mesopotamian civilization. Marriages were arranged for women by their parents, with a formal contract being drawn up. The husband served as authority over his wife and children just as he did over his slaves. Early Sumerians may have given women greater latitude than came to be the case later on.

COINTELPRO - Wikipedia

Their religion attributed considerable power to female sexuality and their early law gave women important rights, so that they could not be treated as outright property. At all points, a good portion of Mesopotamian law such as the Hammurabic code was given over to prescriptions for women, assuring certain basic protections but clearly emphasizing limits and inferiority.

Patriarchal conditions also could vary from one agricultural civilization to another. Egyptian civilization gave women, at least in the upper classes, more credit and witnessed a number of powerful queens. The beautiful Nefertiti, wife of Akhenaton, seemed to have been influential in the religious disputes in this reign.

Some agricultural societies gave women a certain importance by tracing descendants from mothers rather than fathers. This was true, for example, of Jewish law.

Cultural assimilation of Native Americans - Wikipedia

But even these matrilineal societies held women to be inferior to men; for example, Jewish law insisted that men and women worship separately. So while variety is truly important, it usually operated within a framework of basic patriarchalism.

It was around B. Fill her belly, clothe her back. But hold her back from getting the mastery. Remember that her eye is her stormwind, and her vulva and mouth are her strength. This was particularly true in the upper classes and in cities where men frequently took over the most productive work, craft production, or political leadership, for example.

More generally, agricultural societies were based on concepts of property, beginning with the ways land was organized. Early law codes were based on property relationships.

It seemed essential in these circumstances for a man to be sure who his heirs were - that is, to try to make sure that he monopolized the sexual activities of his wife or wives. Within this framework, in turn, it became possible to think of women as inferior and partly ornamental, so that when groups achieved a certain prosperity they often tried to demonstrate this by further reducing the status of women.

This was a very clear pattern in Chinese civilization and may have operated also in India and, later, in western Europe. Patriarchalism, in sum, responded to economic and property conditions in agricultural civilizations and might deepen over time. Patriarchalism raises important questions about women themselves.

Many women internalized the culture of patriarchalism, holding that it was their job to obey and to serve men and accepting arguments that their aptitudes were inferior to those of men. But patriarchalism did not preclude some important options for women.

In many societies a minority of women could gain some relief through religious functions, which could provide a chance to operate independent of family structures. Patriarchal laws defined some rights for women even within marriage, protecting them in theory from the worst abuses.

Sumerian law, for example, gave women as well as men the right to divorce on certain conditions when their spouse had not lived up to obligations.

Women also could form networks, if only within a large household. Older women, who commanded the obedience of many daughters-in-law as well as unmarried daughters, could powerfully shape the activities of the family.

The fact remains that patriarchalism was a commanding theme in most agricultural civilizations, from the early centuries onward.

Enforcing patriarchalism, through law and culture, provided one means by which these societies regulated their members and tried to achieve order. While women were not reduced to literal servitude by most patriarchal systems, they might have come close. Their options were severely constrained.

Girls were raised to assume patriarchal conditions, and boys were raised with full consciousness of their distinctiveness. In many agricultural civilizations patriarchalism dictated that boys, because of their importance in carrying on the family name and the chief economic activities, were more likely to survive.Individual rights are more important than national safety, because those rights define the nation.

National security should not be used as a convenient excuse to violate individual rights, because those rights define the nation.

Society have subverted some of our individual rights

Our Bill of Rights was the result of tremendous efforts to institutionalize and protect the rights of human beings. It strengthened the premise of our Constitution: that the people are the root of all power and authority for government.

When you take a look at some of the overarching systems that influence society, like religion and government, it’s clear we wish to be led. There’s nothing necessarily wrong with this, as a good leader or mentor can help us accomplish great things. The United States held that man’s life is his by right (which means: by moral principle and by his nature), that a right is the property of an individual, that society as such has no rights, and that the only moral purpose of a government .

The Circle of Reason, Inc., is a (c)(3) non-profit organization devoted to fellowship and service to society, but in a way different than you've seen before -- as an . NEXT; Part 1; Reflections; Library; Our Decline; Gains Of France Compute your gains: see what is got by those extravagant and presumptuous speculations which have taught your leaders to despise all their predecessors and all their contemporaries, and even to despise themselves, until the moment in which they became truly despicable.

How John Dewey Destroyed the Souls of Our Children - The Imaginative Conservative