Mercy killing should be legalized essay help

Essay Living in the civilized society of the 21st century implies tackling certain dilemmas that have haunted humanity throughout the prevailing part of its history. One of these unresolved issues, which have raised heated public debates in the recent several decades, is the question whether mercy killing should be legalized and mercy killers should be prosecuted by law. Society has divided into two opposing groups hardly leaving someone indifferent. The issue of mercy killing deals closely not only with law, but also with morality and the basic principles of humanity, thus being an interdisciplinary question with enormous potential impact on the daily life of people all over the world.

Mercy killing should be legalized essay help

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. As a concept easy to understand, it is the act of killing someone painlessly. Proponents of mercy killing have questioned the quality of life experienced by the patients as well as the financial and emotional burden upon the family.

Detractors have discredited the acceptance of euthanasia arguing along the prospects if miracle recoveries that could occur if one were kept alive.

It is difficult to reconcile these two seemingly contrasting perspectives or to measure them on a similar scale.

mercy killing should be legalized essay help

The value of human existence is to be able to enjoy life, and the enjoyment of life can only be experienced in a state of a conscious being. Hence, unconscious patients living off life support systems are unable to truly enjoy life.

Help essay writing via the academic tips with essa

The definition of life should not merely constitute biological existence but also the conscious existence that actually brings purpose and meaning to their life.

A patient who is deemed unrecoverable in a vegetative state should not be artificially kept alive. The emotional turmoil to watch your loved one lie unconscious in a ward leaves one lost and helpless. The financial cost of long term use of life support system are costly and may not be affordable to the majority.

It would be unfair to put loved ones through the prolonged suffering of watching the patient kept alive on life support system, as well as the heavy financial burden of supporting a patient. Although these claims are indeed true, detractors perceive the sanctity of life to override any practical concerns at hand.

Life is a God-given right and that has to be respected and protected under all circumstances. In the religion perspective, mercy killing would be seen as the involuntary termination of the right to life as the patient would be unable to actively make that decision for himself.

There have also been cases of miracle recoveries in seemingly incurable conditions. Mercy killing would eliminate all possibilities at hand; no matter now slight a potential successful recovery. The termination of life would be a hefty risk to take.

However, this is subjected to different points of views. If we were to approach it from a non-atheist point of view, then life would be perceived as a divine gift. Hence, the individual has no right to take his own life, as it was never his to begin with.

Thus, on a religious level, the right to life can be seen as sacred leading us to the necessary conclusion that mercy killing should not be legalized.

Cba essay format power point help written while high with essays assignments img10

Although legalizing mercy killing would open another avenue for low-income families, but it would result in other implications. Its existence may be seen as an immense propensity for abuse. In certain situations, family of the patient may pressure that individual to decide to go through euthanasia to rid them of a financial burden or to gain access to their inheritance.

That patient might be pressured to do so as they see themselves as a financial burden and painless killing sounds like an attractive method of suicide.

Even if the family is not manipulative, the terminally ill individual might feel guilty about the burden he has created for family and chooses to die on this basis rather than a genuine desire to end his life.

Mercy killing would often be perceived as an easy way out of life. As it is defined as the act of killing someone painlessly, many would find it attractive to seek that as a form of escapism.

Despite the fact that euthanasia may be appropriate for patients that have lost both their biological and conscious existence, some may exploit this as a way of easy escape. Research has shown that the ability and threshold of a pain for humans is adaptable.

Hence, I do feel that humans are able to overcome situations that one may be facing and euthanasia should not be used as an easy way out. By implementing this, humans would have an easier alternative and this would cause many to give up on their lives easily.

Parents would be left helpless but to accept the fact that their child has decided to go through euthanasia. The restriction of the right to have a say in this matter leaves many vulnerable to whatever decision that individual has made.

And hence leaving no say to his loved ones makes it disheartening for the people around him. With euthanasia, one would be likely to have less endurance and resort to the easy way out, escapism.

Euthanasia is a form of taking your own life away, which coincides with the definition of suicide. How indifferent are these two entities?

Perhaps, euthanasia is just a scientific way of putting across the idea of suicide and therefore I feel that it should not be legalized.Euthanasia, commonly known as mercy killing, is a way to end the agony of those who are suffering from terminal illnesses and should be legalized instead of having to be preformed in secrecy.

The medical and ethical concerns focus on the health care delivery system . Legalizing mercy killing will help freeing a person from shackles of life worse than death. Sometimes incurable medical condition makes life of a person and his near and dear-ones a living hell.

The KLRC recommended that mercy killing should be legalized on humanitarian grounds. Essay on Euthanasia Should Be Legalized - Webster defines euthanasia as “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy.”.

The debate specifically says "Do you agree or disagree with euthanasia or mercy killing?". What is being advocated is the right of an individual to make a decision, not to have a say or coerce an individual to make the decision to want to die.

ESSAY SAMPLE ON Should mercy killing be legalised with. Thus, on a religious level, the right to life can be seen as sacred leading us to the necessary conclusion that mercy killing should not be legalized. Although legalizing mercy killing would open another avenue for low-income families, but it would result in other implications.

ESSAY SAMPLE ON Should mercy killing be legalised with. Thus, on a religious level, the right to life can be seen as sacred leading us to the necessary conclusion that mercy killing should not be legalized. Although legalizing mercy killing would open another avenue for low-income families, but it would result in other implications.

Should Mercy Killing Be Made Legal?