Corporal Punishment What is corporal punishment? Corporal punishment refers to the use of physical punishment to correct behaviour.
The Swedish Ban on Corporal Corporal punishment in schools Its History and Effects Joan E. From Family Violence Against Children: To many of us, particularly those of us living in North America, this appears to have been a radical and, to some, intrusive legal development.
However, from the Swedish perspective, the law was the logical conclusion of an evolutionary process that unfolded over a period of decades. The present chapter will provide an outline of this development followed by an evaluation of the effects of the law.
First it is important to note that Swedish society as a whole has undergone an evolution over the past century that has produced an increasingly collective and egalitarian social context in which such legal changes have taken place. Promotion of children's physical and mental health has become a cornerstone of family policy, as reflected in Sweden's well-developed child care system, parental leave and sickness insurance provisions, and health care system.
Moreover, the Swedish state has increasingly moved into what has traditionally been considered to be the private sphere with the support of the majority of its citizens. But bythere was sufficient concern about this situation that the Education Act was amended to forbid corporal punishment in the gymnasiums secondary schools.
Sweden was one of the first countries to implement such a measure. Its significance is made clear when one notes that corporal punishment is still legally sanctioned in Canadian schools more than half a century later. The success of this early measure, together with continuing concern about the level of violence permitted toward children in the home, led to a change in the Parenthood and Guardianship Code a civil code governing family law in In an attempt to reduce severe beatings, the word "punish" was replaced by "reprimand" in the section defining permissible parental behavior.
The legal defense for corporal punishment remained in place, however, in both the Parents' Code and the Penal Code. Parental violence was continuing to occur, and it was believed that maintaining the defense in the legal codes was contributing to this problem by providing an explicit sanctioning of corporal punishment.
Inthe section permitting parents to use force in reprimanding their children was completely removed from the Penal Code. The intent of this change was to provide children with the same protection from assault that adults receive and to clarify the grounds for criminal prosecution of parents who abused their children.
Parents' rights to use corporal punishment had still not been eliminated completely, however, as the Parents' Code still contained a paragraph permitting this practice.
This situation allowed parents to use mild forms of physical discipline that would not constitute assault: The inconsistency of these two sets of laws was eliminated inwhen the parental right to use corporal punishment was removed from the Parents' Code.
At the same time that laws permitting corporal punishment in the home were being repealed, so were those allowing this form of discipline to take place in other child care settings.
Inan "experiment" was carried out in the welfare schools; the teachers were asked to refrain from using corporal punishment for 1 year, after which they could evaluate the success of this approach.
While there was some initial resistance to this idea and some debate in the media, during the course of that year, a change took place in the Headmasters' beliefs such that they no longer felt that beating was necessary and the media debate diminished considerably Linde, As a result, witnessed the abolition of corporal punishment in the Statutes for Child Care Institutions and Reformatory Schools.
It was expected that now parents and other caregivers would cease to use physical force.Information, pictures and links on the paddling or spanking of students in United States schools, past and present.
Feature article on corporal punishment north of the border. Caning in Private Schools, s [HISTORY] Extract from a sociological study of elite boys' private schools in , giving statistics for how many senior boys and how many teachers were allowed to administer corporal punishment and a discussion of the frequency of use of the cane.
Corporal Punishment Violation of Child Rights in Schools: The child is father of an adult. The child is an abridged adult with rights which cannot be abridged. The Child is a person for all practical purposes. However, corporal punishment is just one of the many ways to discipline a child.
A parent must weigh their options very carefully, and always have an open and heartfelt conversation (in addition to, or in lieu of, corporal punishment) with the child in order to encourage understanding, respect and learning.
The AAFP defines corporal punishment in schools as the purposeful infliction of bodily pain or discomfort by an official in the educational system upon a student as a penalty for disapproved behavior. HUMAN RIGHTS. The high court judgment in the case of YG versus the State in banned corporal punishment in the home, which, in effect, bans it in all places. Corporal punishment is permitted in Ohio schools if a school board follows several procedures before voting to allow it. Parents in districts which allow it may refuse to have their children paddled. 2.
Here we use a common (in North America) definition of corporal punishment as physical contact by a parent with the intent of modifying the behavior of . the prevalence of corporal punishment in private and public schools and the approval of this policy from the viewpoint of teachers, recent-graduate students, and parents through exploring their reactions and how they perceive corporal punishment.