An analysis of the issue of whether the syrian refugees should or should not be allowed to enter the

Linkedin Comment A girl holds a child inside a refugee camp for the internally displaced in Jrzinaz area, southern part of Idlib province, Syria October 13, An internally displaced girl poses at a makeshift refugee camp in Sinjar town, in Idlib province, Syria November 20,

An analysis of the issue of whether the syrian refugees should or should not be allowed to enter the

Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you. The bill has gained Congressional support in light of the recent ISIS attack on Paris, and over half of US state governors have vowed to block refugee resettlement in their states.

Although Senate Democrats are expected to block passage of the bill, a public debate has developed around whether refugees pose a risk to national security.

Lawmakers and the American public should consider the following four points in support of resettlement as they wade through this debate. Gaining refugee status in the US is not easy.

From a security standpoint, geography affords the US a huge advantage when it comes to vetting refugees, a process it already handles extremely well. The US has resettled nearlyrefugees since September 11,and only three have been arrested for activities related to terrorism.

Refugees are permitted to live in the US for a year and allowed to apply for a green card, which requires more security screening.

An analysis of the issue of whether the syrian refugees should or should not be allowed to enter the

All told, resettlement screening typically takes 18 months. Debating the refugee issue detracts attention from other serious threats Focusing extensively on the potential threats posed by refugees distracts from other pressing security challenges highlighted by the Paris attacks.

However, none of the attackers have been confirmed as refugees, and the majority were actually citizens of France or Belgium. French intelligence knew of at least three of the attackers, and received warnings about their movements from foreign intelligence services in the leadup to the attack.

Several of the attackers even traveled to Syria to fight before returning to France and Belgium. While intelligence agencies in these countries were aware of their presence back home, they were unable to connect the suspects to each other or the chatter ahead of the attacks.

Radicals at home, rather than new arrivals, were the perpetrators in France. However, visa waivers that permit European travelers to enter the US without interviews and background checks could pose a direct challenge to national security.

Officials speculated that at least one of the Paris attackers could have slipped through the watchlist system, giving gaps in European intelligence added significance. The US will likely take steps to reform the waiver process for European states in the coming days, with proposed legislation due in early December that would prevent travelers who had visited Iraq or Syria in the last five years from receiving a waiver.

These and other challenges, like how best to track returning foreign terrorist fighters FTF and the difficulties of working around personal encryption technologiesare worthy of greater deliberation and constructive debate than the threat from refugees.

Refugee resettlement counters ISIS narratives Countering ISIS narrativeswhich vilify the US and are intended to radicalize youths on the fringes of society, should remain a priority for policymakers.

While lawmakers have presented their posturing as standing tough on domestic security, the group has aimed to cast itself as the only alternative to a Western society indifferent to the plight of Syrian Muslims.

ISIS has incorporated footage of drowning and mistreated refugees into its propaganda alongside religious rhetoric to demonstrate that it is the true protector of the global Sunni Muslim community.

Proximity to the conflict has burdened these states immensely. Germany is expected to resettlerefugees by the end of Even France has committed to accept 30, There are cogent, well-articulated arguments for and against US intervention to end the chaos that permits ISIS to thrive and the tortuous Assad regime to drive its citizens from its borders.

But this safety does not absolve the US of responsibility to join the international community in assisting refugees. To do otherwise would be unconscionable."Given the tragedy in Paris last Friday [Nov.

13, ], the U.S. simply cannot, should not and must not accept any Syrian refugees. Unfortunately, the Obama administration has pledged that the U.S. would accept an additional 45, new refugees, mostly from Syria, from to This must not happen.

Syrian Displacement to Turkey and Turkey’s Response

On the question of whether Syrian refugees should be encouraged or allowed to enter the United States, college graduates, 69%, are more likely than non-college graduates, 43%, to have this view.

Women, 57%, are more likely than men, 49%, to say refugees should enter the United States. News and analysis on Catalonia's struggle for self-determination from Green Left Weekly's European bureau. The United Nations and the organizers of the Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games have signed an agreement to highlight the important contribution that sport makes in the race to reach the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), by the ambitious deadline of Nov 17,  · 4 Things To Know About The Vetting Process For Syrian Refugees The Paris attacks have ignited a debate over whether Syrian refugees should be allowed into the U.S.

Refugees are vetted by various. Whether the United States should accept Syrian refugees has become an urgent debate in the days since the terror attacks in Paris. At least 30 governors have said they’re against letting refugees into their states because of fears that terrorists could hide among those seeking political asylum.

Los Angeles Times - We are currently unavailable in your region